if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[320,100],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3','ezslot_5',114,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3-0'); Cited by: Cited Regina v Dica CACD 5-May-2004 Reckless HIV transmission Grievous Bodily Harm The defendant appealed against his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm. Eleanor Sharpston QC, one of the barristers who acted for the defendants in the Brown case, says the charges were never designed for prosecuting consensual sex. GPs were synthesized from alkali-activated metakaolin using H2O2 as a blowing agent and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant. 9901191 ZR; The Times, 15 October 1999: Court of Appeal (EWCA Crim) Consent; sado-masochism; bodily harm; non-fatal assaults: 90: . Thus, the consent in licensed boxing events is to intentional harm within the rules and a blow struck between rounds would be an assault. A majority ruling in the House of Lords said the fact that the men had consented to the acts, which included inserting fish hooks through the penis and nailing foreskin and scrotum to a board, provided no defence. The problem has always been to decide at what level the victim's consent becomes ineffective. He said again that this had been consensual. Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, Firstpost Homes Ltd v Johnson and Others: CA 14 Aug 1995, Regina v Brown (Anthony); Regina v Lucas; etc, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999. There was no evidence of any sexual motive. Consent in such cases does not exist at all because the act consented to is not the act done. Until recently, the case has never been challenged, but its current status was complicated by the then general assumptions that "infliction" required some act of violence, and that non-physical injuries could not be inflicted and so were outside the scope of the Offences Against the Person Act. In criminal law, consent may be used as an excuse and prevent the defendant from incurring liability for what was done.[1]. 114 Citing Cases From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research Sw. Bell Tel., L.P. v. Emmett Download PDF Check Treatment Summary holding that local governmental agency's refusal to comply with Water Code provision constituted ultra vires act Summary of this case from City of New Braunfels v. Tovar See 10 Summaries He was convicted of occasioning actual bodily harm. Cited - Rex v Donovan CCA 1934 However, consent is valid in a range of circumstances, including contact sports (such as boxing or mixed martial arts), as well as tattooing and piercing. Mr Justice Willis said "that consent obtained by fraud is no consent at all is not true as a general proposition either in fact or in law". Case report and review of the . Churchill-Coleman) for the landlord; Kim Lewison QC (Solr to Hammersmith and Fulham Council) for the council. The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines crime as; "act (usually grave offence) punishable by law; evil act; such acts collectively" It will be noted that many crimes are also torts and vice-versa. The community prefers that sexual relationships are a private matter between the individuals involved and if adults were suddenly to be liable to prosecution for taking known risks with their health, this would represent a significant interference with personal autonomy. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Gross negligence manslaughter; Liability for omissions: duty of care, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/child, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/non-dependent child, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility: drug takers; manslaughter, liability for omissions; contractual duty; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; creation of a dangerous situation; arson, Liability for omissions; police officer: misconduct in public office, Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment; act/omission distinction; murder, Liability for omissions; gross indecency with a child, Liability for omissions; performance of duty: extent of duty, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured/without a licence, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured; aggravated vehicle taking, Causation; intervening events; death by dangerous driving, Causation; intervening acts of third party: drug importation, Causation; intervening acts of third party; manslaughter, Environment Agency v Empress Car Co (Abertillary) Ltd, Causation; intervening act of third party; pollution; strict liability, Causation; intervening acts of third party; medical treatment; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim; assault occasioning ABH, Causation; intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: lapse of time; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: joint administration; manslaughter, Causation; supply of drugs; duty of care; gross negligence manslaughter, Causation; pre-existing medical condition: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; Jehovah's Witness: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; recognisable psychiatric injury; manslaughter/GBH, Mens rea, intention; motive; doing acts likely to assist the enemy, Re A (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Separation conjoined twins: civil declaration; intention; necessity; murder, Motive; moral purpose; conspiracy to commit breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911, Malice; Mens rea; Offences against the person, Intoxication; mens rea; recklessness; specific/basic intent; arson, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; murder, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; continuing act; assault, Transferred malice; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Attorney General's Reference (No.3 of 1994), Transferred malice; murder/manslaughter; GBH rule, Transferred malice; accessories: joint enterprise; murder; Tyrell principle, Mistake; presumption of mens rea: strict liability; inciting a girl under 14 to commit an act of gross indecency, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability, Gammon Ltd. V Attorney General of Hong Kong, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; ECHR Art.7, Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; funding terrorism, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; freedom of expression; proscribed organisations; terrorism offences, Strict liability; rape of a child; ECHR arts. On appeal the conviction was quashed. If an individual who knows that he is suffering from HIV conceals this stark fact from his sexual partner, the principle of her personal autonomy is not enhanced if he is exculpated when he recklessly transmits HIV to her through consensual sexual intercourse. .Cited Meachen, Regina v CACD 20-Oct-2006 The appellant appealed his conviction for anal rape. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. THE PRIMARY purpose of the Law Society's jurisdiction to intervene in a solicitor's practice under s 35 of and Pt I of Sch I to the Solicitors Act 1974 was the protection of the public against the activities of a dishonest or incompetent solicitor. Had she been aware, she would not have submitted to the intercourse. Mr Justice Stephens had said (at p.44) "the only sorts of fraud which so far destroy the effect of a woman's consent as to convert a connection consented to in fact into a rape are frauds as to the nature of the act itself, or as to the identity of the person who does the act. Pearlman BL, Fenves AZ, Emmett M. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Therefore, there would be two middle characters a and v, we print the second middle character. On the other hand, the public interest also requires that the principle of personal autonomy in the context of adult non-violent sexual relationships should be maintained. The case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts is one of the few judgments that most law students actually read, and the facts tend to stay with them. But public policy requires courts to lay down limits on the extent to which citizens are allowed to consent or are to be bound by apparent consent given. Similarly, no consent can be given for an incestuous relationship nor for relationships that expose one of the parties to excessive violence (e.g. Hunza Guides is Pakistan's top mountain destination management company offering full board tours, trekking and expeditions services in Pakistan. The decision in the Brown case flowed from detailed consideration of three earlier authorities, R v Coney (1882) 8 QBD 534, R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498 and Attorney General's Reference (No. Auteur/autrice de la publication : Post published: 16 juin 2022; Haughton v. Marjoram, R v (1999) (Court of Appeal) Pagett, R v (1983) 76 Cr App R 279 (Court of Appeal) Smith, R v [1959] 2 QB 35; White, R v [1910] 2 KB 124 (Court of Appeal) Subscribe on YouTube. Text for H.R.2471 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 It was not therefore necessary to show ongoing dishonesty at the date when a notice of intervention was served. Judicial review; contraception; minors under 16; 'concealed' necessity. The pH of the BC solution was measured by filtering the suspension of 0.1 g BC: 20 mL Milli-Q water with 4-h end-over-end rotation (30 rpm) and centrifugation (4000 rpm, 10 min) [19]. The law says consent is a defence to the intentional infliction of harm in activities from surgery and circumcision to tattooing, ear-piercing and violent sports such as boxing and rugby. This is a criminal law version of the civil law principle volenti non fit injuria (Latin for consent does not make an [actionable] injury) and the victim consents to run the risk (not the certainty) of injury arising within the rules of the game being played. It was not suggested that any rape . Minutes of the LCCSA AGM on 16/11/18 at the Crypt, Risk Assessment "Toolkits" for London Magistrates' Courts, HMCTS Email address to report Covid-19 related information (London Magistrates Courts), Joint Media Release HMCTS Safety Concerns 20.01.2021, New ID card gives solicitors fast-track court access, Karl Turner MP Coronavirus Legal Aid Report, A new report re vulnerable children, by charity Just for Kids Law, Video message from the Lord Mayor of London and the Lord Chief Justice, LCCSA Letter to the Government 18th July 2022, Letter to Solicitors with Cases at Harrow and Isleworth Crown Courts 1st Sept 2022, Youth Justice Board Recovery Guidance for Youth Offending Teams, End of Met PS Virtual Remand Hearings from 8/12/20, LCCSA Call for Action During state of Emergency, Letter to Legal Representatives attending police custody suites, APPG on Legal Aids Westminster Commission on the Sustainability of Legal Aid, Archbold 2021 10% offer for LCCSA Members, Magistrate Courts will remain open on Monday 19th September, Tuesday Truth-Lammy Report and the Justice Charter, Breach of Bail Arrest Warrants VRH Pilot Note, Statement by LCCSA President Hesham Puri Voting with our Feet 5th September 2022, Harrows spring update on listings and productions, CLSA invites LCCSA Members to their Annual Conference Friday 14th October, LCCSA Photos from the Annual Summer Party 2017, The London Advocate Summer Edition 2020, Stepping into Shoe Print and Footwear Mark Analysis, Sentencing young adults getting it right first time. The activity had in fact been ongoing for more than ten years and the participants had "positively wanted, asked for, the acts to be done to them . He had HIV/Aids, and was found to have transmitted the disease by intercourse when the victims were not informed of his condition. If it is proposed to criminalise the consensual taking of risks of infection by having unprotected sexual intercourse, enforcement is impractical. Also from SAGE Publishing. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Till was born to working-class parents on the South Side of Chicago. trader joe's chocolate ganache cake LIVE; madison 56ers apparel; r v emmett 1999 case summary. After that, 5 ml of APTES was added and the system was refluxed at 80 C for 24 hours under a nitrogen atmosphere. grand united order of odd fellows Menu Toggle; coastal vacation rentals holden beach For an offence to be tried summarily, a) the DPP must consent to a summary trial b) the District Court must be satisfied that the offence is minor. 32, The Law Commission: Consultation Paper No. In the Australian Capital Territory, the effect of alcohol or other drugs is less qualified; there is no consent if it is caused by "the effect of intoxicating liquor, a drug or anaesthetic". In R v Richardson [1998] 2 Cr App R 200, the patient believed that she was receiving dental treatment which otherwise would have given rise to an assault occasioning actual bodily harm, from a dentist who had in fact been struck off the register. Immunotherapy is based on manipulation of the immune system in order to act against tumour cells, with growing evidence especially in melanoma patients. 1.Introduction. The application of solid adsorbents for oil spills remediation has gained attention in recent times. The Court held that the identity of the defendant was not a feature which, in that case, precluded the giving of consent by the patient. In R v Cort [2003] 3 WLR 1300, a case of kidnapping, the complainants had consented to taking a ride in a car, but not to being kidnapped. why was carrie's sister dropped from king of queens . On a different occasion, she agreed that he could pour fuel from a lighter onto her breasts and set fire to the fuel. . After taking the jewellery the two of them tied her up. 7. R v Bennett (1995) - judge obliged to direct jury where reasonable possibility that accused did not form MR. R v Pordage (1975) - about whether did or did not form mens rea, not about whether capable of forming it . The latter concluded that while you cannot consent to serious and disabling injury, you could consent to minor injury in a sexual context. In New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, consent is not possible when the complainant was asleep or unconscious. The House of Lords ruling on consent and the limits of the intrusion of criminal law in peoples sexual relationships has been criticised by many. Accordingly, in such circumstances the issue either of informed consent, or honest belief in it will only rarely arise: in reality, in most cases, the contention would be wholly artificial. 134 Criminal Law Consent and Offences against the Person; A Response on the Issues for Sports and Games' by the Central Council of Physical Recreation, submitted by Peter Lawson, General Secretary, (1995) 3 Sport and the Law Journal 4, This page was last edited on 30 January 2023, at 13:54. This article has no summary. In other words, the court distinguished between "willingly running the risk of transmission" and "willingly consenting to the risk of transmission.". Richard Davies QC (Vizards) for the appellant; Nigel Baker QC, Desmond Bloom-Davis (Antony Gorley & Co, Newbury) for the respondent. 1824). "To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. In 2000, the government repeated that view in a consultation relating to the law on manslaughter, "The Government remains wholly committed to this approach." The men in the Brown case had argued that consent should provide a defence to the charges on the basis that people have the right to deal with their own body and the law should not punish consensual achievement of sexual satisfaction. Judge LJ. R v Emmett, [1999] EWCA Crim 1710). In R v Navid Tabassum (May, 2000). Now the ruling in R v Chan-Fook [1994] 1 WLR 689, which held that psychiatric injury could be actual bodily harm, has been confirmed by the House of Lords in R v Burstow, R v Ireland [1998] 1 Cr App R 177. The appellants in. The case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts became a legal guideline. r v emmett 1999 case summary. Cruelty is uncivilised.. OCGA 9-11-56 (c) ." Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 ( 405 S.E.2d 474) (1991). Judicial review; assisted suicide; euthanasia; necessity; ECHR Art.8, Child; effective participation in trial; ECHR Art.6, Insanity; automatism; epilepsy; non-fatal assault: GBH, Insanity; automatism; diabetes; non-fatal assault: ABH, Insanity; automatism; diabetes; TWOC; disqualified driving, Insanity: 'nature and quality of act'; murder, Insanity; automatism; mental disorder; voluntary intoxication; voluntary control, Attorney-General's Reference (No. They were cheering on the boxers whose conduct was likely to and did produce a breach of the peace, so any mutual consent given by the fighters was vitiated by the public nature of the entertainment irrespective of the degree of injury caused or intended. The case, she recalls, involved a group of ordinary men who happened to be homosexual and into S&M, who occasionally got together to act out fantasies, got sexual stimulation, and had a cup of tea at the end. The court held that, even if the victim had consented to a being restrained and gagged, his consent was invalid because there was no way for him to communicate its withdrawal once the gag was in his mouth.[4]. They were convicted of robbery and appealed on the grounds that the force came after they had appropriate the jewellery and thus did not come within the requirement of being immediately before or at the time of stealing. 6 of 1980) [1981] QB 715. The defendant was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm contrary to section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. approved the final version of the article and declare no conflict of interest . When this tape accidentally found its way into the hands of the police, they were all arrested and . In R v Coney, the Court of Appeal held that prize fighting was unlawful, irrespective of the consent of the fighters, as it served no useful purpose and it had a tendency to incite riots and breaches of the peace. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. They wanted transport, not kidnapping. In R v Emmett [1999], the defendant was charged under Section 47 of the OAPA 1861 after - following her requests - tying a plastic bag over his girlfriend's head and, on a separate occasion, setting alight lighter fuel he had poured over her breasts. Breeze v John Stacey & Sons Ltd; CA (Peter Gibson, Judge, Clarke LJJ) 21 June 1999. These are some of the questions considered by the Domestic Abuse Bill (DAB) 2020. 5SAH Webinar EncroChat- Practical Steps for a Defence Lawyer what do we know so far? Timothy Dutton QC (Wright Son & Pepper) for the Law Society; Ian McCulloch, Nigel Brockley (Straw & Pearce, Loughborough) for the solicitor. r v emmett 1999 case summary. Stephen Auld QC (Pinsent Cutis, Birmingham) for the plaintiffs; Christopher Vajda QC, George Peretz (Treasury Solicitor) for the defendants. Theft; intention permanently to deprive; borrowing, Theft; intention permanently to deprive; abandonment, Theft; robbery; intention permanently to deprive; abandonment, Theft; intention permanently to deprive; particular property, Theft; intention permanently to deprive; condition as to return of property, Robbery; theft; appropriation; timing of force, Attorney- General's References (No.1 and 2 of 1979), Aggravated burglary; possession of weapon, Aggravated burglary; possession of weapon: timing, Deception; false representation: overcharging, Fraud; false representation; overcharging, Metropolitan Police Commissioner v Charles, Deception; implied representation: cheques, Fraud; false representation; failure to disclose material facts; 'gain', Deception; failure to disclose change in circumstances, Fraud; failure to disclose change in circumstances, Fraud; false representation; mens rea; intention re representation, Fraud; abuse of position; expected to safeguard interests of another, Criminal damage; lawful excuse; belief in consent, Criminal damage; lawful excuse; defence of property. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Manage Settings Further, the law cannot expect people suddenly to become honest with each other and to counsel the use of condoms, and there may be negative consequences if HIV was to be disclosable, because those who ought to take medical advice and undergo tests, might be discouraged from doing so. Am J Med. As an application of parens patriae, for example, minors cannot consent to having sexual intercourse under a specified age even though the particular instance of statutory rape might be a "victimless" offense. ALTHOUGH R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 was not authority in all circumstances for the proposition that consent did not form a basis for a defence in cases of sado-masochistic prac-tices, nevertheless when the realistic risk was of more than transient injury the issue of consent became immaterial. Background: Early rapid weight gain is associated with later overweight, which implies that weight centile crossing tracks over time.Objective: Centile crossing is defined in terms of the change or deviation in weight z score during 1 mo, and the correlations between successive deviations are explored at different ages.Design: Two Cambridge (United Kingdom) growth cohorts were used: Widdowson . Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in, Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile. Citing: Cited - Regina v Emmett CACD 18-Jun-1999 The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. This has since been considered in R. v Dica, which deals with the transmission of HIV, holding that it was not necessary to prove that the transmission had involved an assault for the "inflicting" of the disease. By September 2009, he had infected her with an incurable genital herpes virus. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. b. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R v Stone and Dobinson [1977] 1 QB 354, Court of Appeal. The disagreement over whether the case was about violence or sex, led to the 3:2 split between the judges. In 1998, the Home Office issued a consultation paper entitled Violence: Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 rejecting the Law Commission's recommendation that there should be offences for the intentional or reckless transmission of disease. There, the judges ruled that his customers written consent to carry out ear and nipple removals and a tongue-splitting procedure did not amount to a defence. In an appeal against conviction for two offences of assault occasioning actual bodily harm arising out of sado-masochistic acts between two consenting adults, the issue of consent was immaterial where there was a realistic risk of harm beyond a merely transient or trivial injury . are mint imperials bad for your teeth; kooper davis death hobbs, nm. "Consenting adult" and "Consenting adults" redirect here. This follows the rise in the use of the rough sex defence by defendants in cases of homicide, where defendants claim that death was caused from sexual activities that went wrong. JUSTICE WRIGHT: ON 29TH JANUARY 1999, IN THE CROWN COURT AT NORWICH, THE HIS HONOUR JUDGE DOWNES AND A LADY WHO IS THE SUBJECT OF THESE TWO COUNTS LADY WAS ENVELOPED LORDS IN LORDS, BY A MAJORITY OF 3 TO 2 UPHELD THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT, LORD JAUNCEY AND LORD LOWRY IN THEIR SPEECHES BOTH EXPRESSED THE VIEW LORD JAUNCEY OBSERVED: He had administered a date rape drug. These highly porous GPs were combined at pH 7.5 with cationic CNCs that had been synthesized from . This does not give sport a license to enact rules permitting acts that are clearly, excessively and maliciously violent. The second ceremony will do no more than expose the prospective spouse to a charge of bigamy. These are situations in which a victim may have given apparent consent to parting with ownership or possession of money and/or goods, or to generally suffering a loss, but this consent is treated as vitiated by the dishonesty of the person making the untrue representations. This is an application of the general rule that, once an actus reus with an appropriate mens rea has been established, no defense can be admitted, but the evidence may be admitted to mitigate the sentence. In each case, their sexual partners would not have consented had they known the truth and a reasonable person might be expected to realise this. . Most states have laws which criminalize misrepresentations, deceptions, and fraud. The learned judge, in giving his ruling said: In this case, the degree of actual and potential harm was such and also the degree of unpredictability as to injury was such as to make it a proper cause [for] the criminal law to intervene. It did, however, accept that society should have criminal sanctions for use against "evil acts", and that this might include people who transmitted diseases causing serious illness to others with intent to do them such harm, adding that "this aims to strike a sensible balance between allowing very serious intentional acts to be punished while not rendering individuals liable for prosecution of unintentional or reckless acts or for the transmission of minor disease" (see paras 3.13-318). John Cherryman QC, John L Davies (W.J. most states have a rule that an abusive husband can be prosecuted even if the wife does not co-operate and give evidence to rebut the husband's defense that the wife consented). She brands the prosecution as an abuse of power by the state to interfere with personal relations. The acquired knowledge of these materials and their characteristics have been essential for their application as adsorbents. In cross-examination two of the three women had explicitly acknowledged that, in general, unprotected sexual intercourse carried a risk of infection. This led to the complainant developing septicaemia and dying.