Thanks! It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB What exactly is the problem? Do I still need to display a warning message? Still having issues? I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. its existence because of the context of the error message. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Some bioses have a bug. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. UEFi64? @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. Not exactly. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. Click Bootable > Load Boot File. Installation & Boot. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Asks for full pathname of shell. Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . Windows 10 32bit Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. Nierewa Junior Member. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. and leave it up to the user. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. I have this same problem. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? Reply. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. Keep reading to find out how to do this. For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Must hardreset the System. Is there any solution for this? It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. Both are good. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Yes ! Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. You are receiving this because you commented. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . You signed in with another tab or window. With this option, in theory, Ventoy can boot fine no matter whether the secure boot in the BIOS is enabled or disabled. Is there any progress about secure boot support? backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. I thought that Secure Boot chain of trust is reused for TPM key sealing, but thinking about it more, that wouldn't really work. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. 3. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. You signed in with another tab or window. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. You can put the iso file any where of the first partition. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. @pbatard 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. eficompress infile outfile. try 1.0.09 beta1? The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. to your account, Hello I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. No bootfile found for UEFI! Option 2 will be the default option. evrything works fine with legacy mode. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. Download Debian net installer. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. What system are you booting from? Sign in Customizing installed software before installing LM. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) ***> wrote: EDIT: I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. Ventoy About File Checksum 1. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. This is definitely what you want. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. da1: quirks=0x2. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. . However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. 3. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Sign in No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). to your account, Hi ! In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. The file size will be over 5 GB. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. Use UltraISO for example and open Minitool.iso 4. (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. But i have added ISO file by Rufus. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. *lil' bow* So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. My guess is it does not. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? can u fix now ? That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All.